Checking date: 06/05/2025 18:01:11


Course: 2025/2026

Digital Information literacy
(20047)
Bachelor in Urban Sustainability Studies (Plan: 552 - Estudio: 505)


Coordinating teacher: MARZAL GARCIA-QUISMONDO, MIGUEL ANGEL

Department assigned to the subject: Library and Information Sciences Department

Type: Compulsory
ECTS Credits: 3.0 ECTS

Course:
Semester:




Requirements (Subjects that are assumed to be known)
Students must have developed a set of competences necessary in the Degree and which are essential to follow this subject, referring to the mastery of knowledge and techniques to process information for its capture, organisation, management and communication in digital environments.
Objectives
The educational objectives of the subject are: -To understand the current digital ecosystem and its characteristics. -To understand digital literacy as an object of study and an academic discipline. -To understand the concept of multiliteracies and their academic and professional impact. -To understand the role of digital literacy and various literacies in civic participation and digital citizenship. -To explore the use of tools and applications related to the field of digital literacy in its communicative, educational and collaborative dimensions.
Learning Outcomes
Students are able to¿ 8 ¿consider academic norms and ways of thinking across different disciplines and subject areas, bringing them into play as appropriate. 9 ¿demonstrate intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and exercise independence of mind and thought. 10 ¿communicate ideas clearly, coherently and respectfully, in a range of disciplines and to various stakeholders, in both written and oral form, using appropriate language and referencing. 13 ¿reflect on their own learning, to seek and make use of feedback on their own performance, to recognise when further knowledge is required and to undertake the necessary research.
Description of contents: programme
DIDACTIC UNIT 1. SCIENTIFIC AND PROFESSIONAL FOUNDATIONS FOR AN ACADEMIC SPECIALITY 1. The development space: evolution of the Web, socio-economic models (Economy 4.0), the scientific method in semantic web. 2. From literacies to multiliteracies 3. Challenges for a new landscape: ¿digital divides¿ and competencies 4. Taxonomic models of scientific and academic organisation DIDACTIC UNIT 2. DL AS A PROFESSIONAL AND ACADEMIC OBJECT 1. Digital Competences: Concept, evolution, current affairs 2. The definition of DL for an applicative projection 3. Evolution of the conceptual and instrumental framework of DL: Open Science, Transparency, Open Government, IAG. 4. Impact of DL: Education and Industry 4.0. Relations with Data Literacy and AI Literacy 5. DL and sustainability DIDACTIC UNIT 3. INITIATIVES FOR THE PROFESSIONAL AND ACADEMIC USE OF DL 1. The Global Standards and the EU Standards for DL 2. Spaces for standardisation and updating of a policy for DL 3. Field analysis: good practices of DL implementation in education, academic and professional settings 4. Educational applications: education, publishing of educational digital objects and gaming. 5. Academic applications: projection in curricula. Visual Literacy, New Media Literacy, Metaliteracy. 6. Professional applications: training and qualification of professionals. DIDACTIC UNIT 4. THE FUNCTIONALITY OF DL: EVALUATION OF WEB CONTENT 1. Assessment in digital literacy and literacies: the role of the professional editor and content manager. 2. Digital literacy and literacies assessment systems and models 3. 3. Digital literacy and literacies assessment models and methods: quantitative, qualitative, qualitative 4. Competence indicators, their design and functionality. 5. Professional and economic impact: rankings, web reputation, social responsibility.
Learning activities and methodology
The subject is based on autonomous student learning, which will be guided by the teaching materials prepared by the lecturer, specialised readings and the recommended bibliography. The methodology proposes a model of active and continuous learning, promoting participation through teaching and interaction with the use of technological tools. The following will be provided: ppt transparencies, electronic addresses, computer programmes and practice models through Aula Global. The subject will be structured as follows 1. Conceptual framework, which will provide a pdf document, with the notions and concepts that will be worked on in each didactic unit to show the student a theoretical vision of the discipline that will allow them to acquire the fundamental knowledge for its assimilation and application. 2. Complementary framework, which may be provided for the student to understand the different perspectives, trends and schools through a series of individual readings, in electronic format, through the Aula Global platform. 3. Illustrative framework, which allows the student to understand the concept, for its assimilation and efficient application in their future professional performance. It will consist of electronic and/or virtual resources, complemented by debates. This framework will be nourished by electronic addresses, resources, software and tutorials to support the conceptual discourse. This illustrative framework will allow for practical exercises in understanding the subject matter on an ongoing basis (for lifelong learning). 4. Practical framework, whose function is to enable students to acquire skills, abilities and competences through their own elaboration, in parallel to the development of the classes. Its objective is to accredit what the student knows and knows about the competences proposed in each didactic unit. They will be designed as a learning object: instructional design, associated complementary material, exemplifications, exercise proposal, completion by the student. 5. Questionnaires may be offered for completion by the students, which will serve as a basic element of self-assessment and individual monitoring of the quality of the learning process. 6. Tutorials. In order to effectively develop the educational model, the tutoring system acquires importance in ensuring collaborative and meaningful learning. Two types of tutorials are proposed: one derived from the collective face-to-face tutorials; another of personalised tutorials, referring to their training and academic career; virtual tutorials, for telematic attention on specific days; virtual tutorials, for telematic attention on specific days.
Assessment System
  • % end-of-term-examination/test 60
  • % of continuous assessment (assigments, laboratory, practicals...) 40

Calendar of Continuous assessment


Extraordinary call: regulations
Basic Bibliography
  • Adams, Claudia, Buetow, Stephen, Edlin, Richard, Zdravkovic, Neda y Heyligers, Josta. ¿A collaborative approach to integrating Information and Academic Literacy into the Curricula of Research Methods Courses¿. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40: 222-231. 2016
  • Alper, M. . Developmentally appropriate new media literacies: Supporting cultural competencies and social skills in early childhood education. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, vol. 13 (2), 175-196. 2013
  • Association of College & Research Libraries. Visual Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. ACRL. 2011
  • Berman, E. . Transforming Information Literacy in the Sciences through the lens of e-Science. Communications in Information Literacy, vol. 7 (2), 161-170. 2013
  • Black, Michele y Rechter, Sue. ¿A critical reflection on the use of an embedded academic literacy program for teaching sociology¿. Journal of Sociology, 49 (4): 456-470. 2013
  • Bobish, G.. Participation and pedagogy: Connecting the social web to ACRL learning outcomes. . The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 37 (1), 54-63. 2011
  • Borges, J. . Competências infocomunicacionais na atuação política de organizações da sociedade civil. Tendências da Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação, vol. 7 (2), 81-102 Bowman, N. A. y Bastedo, M. N. 2011. ¿Anchoring effects in world university rankings: Exploring biases in reputation scores¿, Higher Education, 61(4): 431¿444. 2014
  • Borges, J.; Marzal, M.A. . Competencias en información y en comunicación: desarrollo conceptual a partir de la New Media Literacy. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología. Vol. 40, (1), pp. 45-57. 2017
  • Bowman, N. A. y Bastedo, M. N.. ¿Anchoring effects in world university rankings: Exploring biases in reputation scores¿. Higher Education, 61(4): 431¿444. 2011
  • Brandtweiner, R.; Donat, E.; Kerschbaum, J. . How to become a sophisticated user: a two-dimensional approach to e-literacy. New Media & Society, vol. 12 (5), 813-833 . 2010
  • Brown, T.H.. Beyond constructivism: Navigationism in the knowledge era. On the Horizon, vol. 14 (3), 108-120. 2006
  • Buckingham, D. . Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture. Polity Press: Cambridge. 2003
  • Buckingham, D. . Defining digital literacy-what do young people need to know about digital media?. ? En C. Lankshear; M. Knobel (editores), Digital literacies (pp. 73-90). New York: Peter Lang. . 2008
  • Calzada, F.J.; Marzal, M.A. . Incorporating Data Literacy into Information Literacy Programas: Core Competencies and Contents. Libri, vol. 63 (2), 123¿134. 2013
  • Carr, Nicholas. Superficiales: ¿Qué está haciendo Internet con nuestras mentes?. Madrid: Taurus.. 2011
  • Chang, C.S.; Liu, E.Z.F.; Lee, C.Y.; Chen, N.S.; Hu, D.C.; Lin, C.H.. Developing and validating a media literacy self-evaluation scale (MLSS) for elementary school students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 10 (2), 63-71. 2011
  • Cruz-Palacios, E.; Marzal, M.A. Gaming como medio didáctico para las alfabetizaciones múltiples. Videojuegos en la Educación del siglo XXI. Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Videojuegos y Educación (CIVE¿17). Universidad de La Laguna, Puerto de La Cruz (Tenerife). . 2017
  • Denda, K. . Developing Interview Skills and Visual Literacy: A New Model of Engagement for Academic Libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15(2), 299-314. 2015
  • Dunaway, M.K. . Connectivism. Learning theory and pedagogical practice for nerworked information landscapes. Reference Services Review, vol. 39 (4), 675-685. 2011
  • Ferrari, A. . DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies [eds. Y. Punie; B. Brecko]: Luxemburgo. 2013
  • Ferrés, J.; Piscitelli, A. . La competencia mediática : propuesta articulada de dimensiones e indicadores. Comunicar, v. 19 (38), 75-82. 2012
  • García-Jiménez, Eduardo. ¿Concepto de excelencia en enseñanza superior universitaria. A definition of excellence in higher education¿. Educación Médica, 17: 83-87. 2016
  • Gee, J.P.. Good Video Games and Good Learning: Collected Essays on Video games Learning and Literacy. Peter Lang; New York. 2007
  • Gilbert, John, Reiner, Miriam y Nakhleh, Mary [ed]. Visualization: theory and practice in science education. Models and modeling in science education. New York: Springer. 2008
  • Giones-Valls, A.; Serrat-Brustenga, M. . La gestión de la identidad digital: una nueva habilidad informacional y digital. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, 24. 2010
  • Godwin, P. . Information Literacy and Web 2.0: is it just hype? . Program: electronic library and information systems, vol. 43 (3), 264-274. 2009
  • González Fernández-Villavicencio, N. . Alfabetización para una cultura social, digital, mediática y en red. Revista Española De Documentación Científica, 35(Monográfico), 17-45. 2012
  • Guijarro-Jiménez, Clara, Gomera-Martínez, Antonio y Antúnez-López, Manuel. "Propuesta de indicadores de la Responsabilidad Social Universitaria conforme a la guía G4 del GRI: el caso de la Universidad de Córdoba". CIRIEC - Espana, 87: 103-137. 2016
  • Gunn, C.; Hearne, S.; Sibthorpe, J. . Right from the start: A rationale for embedding academic literacy skills in university courses. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 8 (1), 1-6. 2011
  • Hargittai, E. . Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, vol. 23 (3), 371-379. 2005
  • Harris, B. R. . The New ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards. Revising reception. . Communications in Information Literacy, vol.7 (2), 139-145.. 2013
  • Hattwig, D.; Bussert, K.; Medaille, A.; Burgess, J. . Visual literacy standards in higher education: new opportunities for libraries and student learning. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, vol. 13 (1), 61-89. 2013
  • Head, Alison J.. Staying smart: How today's graduates continue to learn once they complete college. Project Information Literacy: Seattle (WA). 2016
  • Henderson-Sellers, B.; González-Pérez, C. . A comparison of four process metamodels and the creation of a new generic standard. Information and Software Technology, vol. 47 (1), 49-65. 2005
  • Holden, I. . Predictors of Students¿ Attitudes toward Science Literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, vol. 6 (1), 107-123. 2012
  • Jacobson, T. E.; Mackey, T. P. . Proposing a metaliteracy model to redefine information literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, vol.7 (2), 84-91. 2013
  • Jenkins, H. et al. . Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. Media Education for the 21st Century. MIT Press; Cambridge (Mas.)-London . 2009
  • Ke, Fenffeng y Hsu Chang-Yu. ¿Mobile augmented-reality artifact creation as a component of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning¿. The Internet and Higher Education, 26: 33-41. 2015
  • Knezovi¿, A.. ¿Rethinking the languages for specific purposes syllabus in the 21st century: Topic-centered or skills-centered¿. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 10 (1): 122-137. 2016
  • Kutner, L.; Armstrong, A. . Rethinking Information Literacy in Globalized World.. Communications in Information Literacy, vol. 6 (1), 24-33. 2012
  • Lee, L.; Chen, D.; Li, J.; Lin, T. . Understanding new media literacy: The development of a measuring instrument. Computers & Education, vol. 85, 84-93. 2015
  • Lim, Miguel Antonio y Williams Øerberg, J. ¿Active instruments: on the use of university rankings in developing national systems of higher education¿. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 1(1): 91¿108. 2017
  • Lin, T.; Li, J.; Deng, F.; Lee, L.. Understanding new media literacy: An explorative theoretical framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 16 (4), 160-170.. 2013
  • MARZAL, Miguel Ángel; COLMENERO, María Jesús; JORGE, Car¬men. Avances en la medición de la Sociedad de la Información desde la perspectiva de la Unión Europea. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, Jul.-Dic. vol. 33, no. 2, p. 423-446. 2010
  • MacMillan, M.; MacKenzie, A. . Strategies for integrating Information Literacy and Academic Literacy. Helping undergraduate students make the most of scholarly articles. Library Management, vol. 33 (8-9), 525-535. 2012
  • Machin-Mastromatteo, J.D.. Participatory action research in the age of social media: literacies, affinity spaces and learning. New Library World, vol. 113 (11-12), 571-585 . 2012
  • Mackey, T. P.; Jacobson, T. E.. Metaliteracy: Reinventing information literacy to empower learners. Facet; London . 2014
  • Marzal, M. A., Borges, J.. Modelos evaluativos de Metaliteracy y alfabetización en información como factores de excelencia académica. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 40(3): 222-231. 2017
  • Marzal, M. A.; Parra, P.. Bibliotecas integradas: alfabetización en información como estímulo de cooperación. El Profesional de la Información, volumen 19, (nº 5, septiembre-octubre) pp. 463-468. 2010
  • Marzal, M. Á., & Martínez-Cardama, S.. Clasificación de la investigación académica en Metaliteracy.. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 43(4), e279-e279.. 2020
  • Marzal, M.A.. La evaluación de los programas de alfabetización en información en educación superior: estrategias e instrumentos. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), vol. 7 (2), 28-38. 2010
  • Marzal, M.A. . Evolución conceptual de la alfabetización en información a partir de la alfabetización múltiple en su perspectiva educativa y bibliotecaria. Investigación Bibliotecológica (Revista de CUIB), volumen 23, (nº 47, enero-abril), pp. 129-160. 2009
  • Marzal, M.A.; Calzada, F.J.; Vianello, M. Criterios para la evaluación de la usabilidad de los recursos educativos virtuales: un análisis desde la alfabetización en información. Information Research, vol. 13, (nº 4). 2008
  • Marzal, M.A.; Calzada. F.J.; Rubalcava, E. . Objetos de Aprendizaje como recursos educativos en programas de alfabetización en información para educación superior de posgrado competencial.. Revista de Investigación Bibliotecológica, 29 (66), p. 139-168. 2015
  • Marzal, M.A.; Cruz-Palacios, E. . Gaming como Instrumento Educativo para una Educación en Competencias Digitales desde los Academic Skills Centres. Revista General de Información y Documentación, v. 28 (2), pp. 489-506. 2018
  • Marzal, M.A.; Parra, P.; Colmenero, M.J. La medición de impacto y evaluación de programas de alfabetización en información para bibliotecas escolares. Revista Española de Documentación Científica 34, 2, abril-junio, 190-211. 2011
  • Marzal, M.A.; Pedrazzi, S.. Educational potential of topic maps and learning objects for m-learning in the knowledge society. Revista Transinformaçao. 27 (3), p. 229-244. 2015
  • Marzal, M.A.; Pedrazzi, S. . Las oportunidades y debilidades del m-learning como factor educativo competencial. Informaçao e Sociedade. Estudos, 24 (1), p. 179-193. 2014
  • Marzal, M.A.; Saurina, E. Diagnóstico del estado de la alfabetización en información (ALFIN) en las universidades chilenas. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v.20, n.2, p.58-78. 2015
  • McBride, M.F. . Reconsidering Information Literacy in the 21st Century: the redesign of an Information Litearcy Class. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol.40 (3), 287-300. 2012
  • Mears-Delgado, B.; Marzal, M.A. . Evalfin: un modelo de evaluación de alfabetización informacional para instituciones de educación superior.. El Profesional de la Información, Vol 27, (4), pp. 879-890. 2018
  • Moselen, C.; Wang, L.. Integrating Information Literacy into Academic Curricula: A professional development programme for librarians at the University of Auckland. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 40, 116-123. 2014
  • Pidd, M.. Tools for Thinking: Modelling in Management Science. Wiley; Chichester. 2009
  • Pisté Beltrán, S.; Marzal, Miguel Ángel. Bibliotecas universitarias y educación digital abierta: un espacio para el desarrollo de instrumentos de implementación en web, de competencias en información e indicadores para su evaluación. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, Vol. 41, (3) /septiembre-diciembre . 2018
  • Radcliff, S; Wong, E. . Evaluation of sources: a new sustainable approach. Reference Services Review, vol. 43 (2), 231 - 250. 2015
  • Rubalcava, E.; Marzal, M.A.; Borges, J. . Information Literacy and Metaliteracy as key factor in academic excellence in Higher Education. Proceedings Western Balkan Information Literacy Conference. Information Literacy in Digital World. Bihac (Boscia-H) 8-11 June 2016. Limerick Institute of Technology (Irlanda), p. 35-42. 2016
  • Shenton, A.K.; Hay-Gibson, N.V. . Information behaviour meta-models. Library Review, vol. 61 (2), 92-109 . 2012
  • Sproles, Claudena, Detmering, Robert y Johnson, Anna Marie. Trends in the literature on library instruction and information literacy, 2001-2010. Reference Services Review, 41 (3): 395-412.. 2013
  • Szigeti, K.; Wheeler, K. . Essential Readings in E-Science. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Winter (64). 2011
  • Thomas, A. B.; Hodges, A. R. . Build sustainable collaboration: Developing and assessing metaliteracy across information ecosystems. Paper presented at the ACRL 2015, Portland, Oregon. 78-94. 2015
  • Tyner, K.. Audiencias, intertextualidad y nueva alfabetización en medios. Comunicar: Revista Científica De Comunicación y Educación, vol. 15 (30), 79-85. 2008
  • Witek, D.; Grettano, T. . Teaching metaliteracy: A new paradigm in action. Reference Services Review, vol. 42 (2), 188-208. 2014
  • Witek, Donna y Grettano, Teresa. . ¿Teaching metaliteracy: A new paradigm in action¿. Reference Services Review, 42 (2): 188-208. 2014
  • Xiong, Yao y Suen, Hoy K. . ¿Assessement approaches in massive open online courses: Possibilities, challenges and future directions. International Review Education, 64: 241-263. 2018

The course syllabus may change due academic events or other reasons.


More information: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/autor?codigo=1402205