Checking date: 05/05/2025 18:21:39


Course: 2025/2026

Development of program and organizational evaluation
(13019)
Bachelor in Sociology (Study Plan 2018) (Plan: 402 - Estudio: 208)


Coordinating teacher: AGULLO TOMAS, MARIA SILVERIA

Department assigned to the subject: Social Sciences Department

Type: Compulsory
ECTS Credits: 6.0 ECTS

Course:
Semester:




Requirements (Subjects that are assumed to be known)
There are not requirements.
Objectives
Knowledge: - And skills to plan and develop applied research in different areas of society. - And domain of social science methodology and its basic and advanced techniques of social research. - And technical skills for the production and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data. Capacities: - To link knowledge of sociology and related sciences. - To adapt the goals to financial and human resources. - To evaluate the projects of public policies, social intervention and its results. - To evaluate the costs and social benefits. - To contribute to the design of public policies to address social problems. - To establish, to develop and to implement programmes and projects of social intervention. - Analysis and synthesis - Management of information. - Organization and planning. Skills: - Development of organizations (consulting, design and management of organizations and institutions). - Ethical commitment. - Team and interdisciplinary work - Decision Making
Learning Outcomes
LEARNING OUTCOMES 1.Having acquired advanced knowledge and demonstrated an understanding of the theoretical and practical aspects and the methodology of work in the area of Sociology with a depth that reaches the forefront of knowledge. 2. Apply the knowledge acquired, their understanding and their abilities to solve complex and/or specialized problems in the professional field. 4. To be able to function in complex situations or that require the development of new solutions both in the academic and labor or professional fields within the field of Sociology study. BASIC COMPETENCES 3. Students have the ability to gather and interpret relevant data (usually within their field of study) in order to make judgements which include reflection on relevant social, scientific or ethical issues. 4. Students should be able to communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialist and non-specialist audiences. GENERAL COMPETENCES 2. Communicate, defend and refute arguments on the most relevant issues in the sociological field on a sound basis, both orally and in writing, recognizing the complexity of social phenomena. SPECIFIC COMPETENCES 9. Know the skills to raise and develop applied research in different areas of society. 13. Possess skills and abilities in developing, using, and interpreting social indicators and social measurement instruments. 15. Know how to choose the relevant social research techniques (quantitative and qualitative) at all times. 17. Possess skills for the evaluation and performance of quality and satisfaction studies. 20.Analyze public policies and social intervention, as well as evaluate their results.
Description of contents: programme
To link the contents of the course whit the previous subject " Introduction to the evaluation of programs and organizations . To indentify and definition the object or unit of evaluation. Delimit of the object - "evaluand" - and to understand of program through different perspectives: 1. Result (Logical Framework). Critics and difficulties in define program goals. Goals-free evaluation and discussion about corrective mechanisms. 2. Process (process map and flowchart), 3. structural elements and 4. change theory (program and implementation theory). To identify logic models: Wisconsin, Kellogs, EFQM, Evaluative Approaches. To drawn information needs and questions: 1) stakeholders perspective (pluralism) 2) Theory-driven evaluation. 3) Final summative judge. To extract informatives questions: Operationalization: of dimensions, criteria, questions and indicators. Definition of the evaluation matrix
Learning activities and methodology
- Teacher explanation of the contents with the active participation of students through dynamic and workshops. This method relate primarily to the acquisition of knowledge and abilities. The students work whit a brief handbooks. These tasks are estimated in 3 ECTS. - The students development a evaluation design. It involves study the object, carry out a little field work, to connect whit organizations (real or supposed). The design can be done in small teams. This task has a value of 2 ECTS. - Specific workshop (planning outcomes, processes and operationalization). The workshop is conducting mainly with the assistance of the teacher in class time. This task is estimated in 1 ECTS. - Individuals or group tutorials. The teacher gives support trough individuals o groups interviews.
Assessment System
  • % end-of-term-examination/test 15
  • % of continuous assessment (assigments, laboratory, practicals...) 85

Calendar of Continuous assessment


Extraordinary call: regulations
Basic Bibliography
  • Alkin, M. (2011),. Evaluation Essensials. . New York: The Guilford press (How do you Understand the Program). .
  • Greene, J. (2006),. Evaluation, democracy, and social change in Shaw, I. Greene, J. and Mark, M. (2006) Handbook of evaluation.. Sage..
  • JCyL. Consejería de Educación y Cultura.. Trabajando con los procesos: guía para la gestión de procesos. . Junta de Castilla y León. Consejería de Cultura y Turismo.. 2004
  • Ligero y otros (2020),. Rayuela: un ejercicio de reflexión y comprobación para hacer una evaluación consciente. . Madrid: Means. .
  • Ligero, J.A.. Dos métodos de evaluación: criterios y teoría del programa.. Madrid: CECOD. 2011
  • Ligero, J.A. (2017),. Dos métodos de evaluación: criterios y teoría del programa. En Feinstein, y otros. La evaluación de políticas. Fundamentos conceptuales y analíticos. . Buenos Aires: CAF. (http://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/1008).
  • Ligero, J.A. y otras (2010),. Análisis de los objetos evaluados en España: la evaluación y las limitaciones de las políticas sociales en SEE ¿valuación. . Revista de la Sociedad Española de Evaluación nº 13 http://www.magisterevaluacion.es/attachments/article/5/Sesion_2.3_Complemento_Articulo_JALigero.pdf.
  • Ligero, J.A: y otros (2010),. Evaluación programa Sales Hoy. . Cruz Roja Española Comunidad de Madrid. www.magisterevaluacion.es/.../5/Ejemplo_Evaluación_SALES_HOY.
  • Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores. Metodología de Evaluación de la Cooperación Española. . Madrid: MAE, Secretaría de Estado para la Cooperación Internacional y para Iberoamérica.. 1998
  • Monnier, E. (1992),. Evaluación de la Acción de los Poderes Públicos (capítulo 4).. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
  • NORAD. El enfoque del Marco Lógico. Manual para la planificación de proyectos orientada mediante objetivos. . Madrid: IUDC, CEDEAl. 1990
  • Patton, M.Q. (2002),. Feminist, Yes, But is it Evaluation? In D. Seigart and S. Brisolara, Feminist Evaluation: Explorations and Experiences. New Directions for Evaluation No. 96.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. .
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation,. Logic Model Development Guide. http://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2010/w-k-kellogg-foundation-evaluation-handbook.
  • Weiss, C. (1998). . Evaluation.. New Jersey: Prentice¿Hall. (Chapter: Understanding the program). .
Additional Bibliography
  • Madaus, G.F., Michael S. Scriven, Daniel L. Stufflebeam (eds.) (1993),. Evaluation models: viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation.. Boston etc. : Kluwer-Nijhoff..
  • Monnier, E. (1995),. Evaluacio¿n de la accio¿n de los poderes pu¿blicos. . Madrid : Ministerio de Economi¿a y Hacienda, Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. .
  • Stufflebeam, D.L. (2001), . Evaluation Models: New Directions for Evaluation.. San Francisco California: Jossey-Bassx..
  • Weiss, C.H. (1998),. Evaluation: methods for studying programs and policies.. New Jersey: Prentice Hall..

The course syllabus may change due academic events or other reasons.