Checking date: 19/05/2024


Course: 2024/2025

Topics in Political Economy
(19317)
Master in Social Sciences (Plan: 481 - Estudio: 325)
EPC


Coordinating teacher: OZEL SERBETÇI, ISIK

Department assigned to the subject: Social Sciences Department

Type: Electives
ECTS Credits: 6.0 ECTS

Course:
Semester:




Objectives
Knowledge: K-1. Advanced knowledge and understanding of the processes of economic, social, and political change, as well as the structures that constitute societies (markets, families, institutions) from an analytical, methodological, and empirical perspective. K-4. Knowledge of comparative analysis and historical analysis applied in the major scientific contributions in Social Sciences. K-5. Knowledge of the internal logic of a scientific publication, examining the clarity of exposition, as well as the consistency between theory, analytical strategy, indicators, results, and conclusions. K-10. Advanced knowledge and understanding of the economic, social, and institutional bases of the functioning of political regimes. Skills: S-1. Ability to synthesize the main theories and empirical contributions in one or more contemporary debates from an interdisciplinary perspective. S-4. Ability to select and apply the method of comparison or historical analysis to the study of a political, economic, or social phenomenon. S-5. Skill in organizing and expressing ideas clearly and unambiguously, and in supporting theoretical arguments on a topic through critical analysis of the literature. S-10. Understand the origin of the institutions of different regimes and their effects on the functioning of the political system. Competencies: C-1. Ability to apply knowledge on existing theoretical and empirical debates in an original development of one's own ideas in a context of academic or applied research. C-4. Ability to select cases and apply the comparative method and/or historical analysis when providing an empirical response to a research question within the framework of applied or academic research. C-5. Ability to identify the strengths and weaknesses of scientific publications in an area of study and to justify the advancement in the knowledge frontier that is intended to be achieved in the research project. C-10. Ability to apply theoretical knowledge and methodological advances on the subject in the development of a research paper in the area of Political Science.
Skills and learning outcomes
Description of contents: programme
The objective of this second year course is to introduce students to the discussion and analysis of a number of Advanced Topics in Political Economy. Students will be exposed to a selection of topics that, whereas it is by no means exhaustive, will present them a panoply of current debates, mainly in the political economy of democracies, although the rise of authoritarianism in democracies and issues related to autocratic politics will also be discussed. Advanced academic research will be presented with the aim of expanding their analytical skills. The ultimate goal is to ensure that students understand, engage and can contribute to current research activity in the discipline. 1. The role of culture in historical political economy studies. 2. Causes and consequences of culture. Persistence and change. 3. Ethnic and national identities in the study of preferences. 4. Out-groups and social affection. 5. Social sorting. 6. Geographical inequalities. 7. The Non-Democratic Legacies of Democracies. 8. Failures of representation in democracies. 9. Polarization and democratic backsliding.
Learning activities and methodology
AF1 - Theoretical class AF3 - Theoretical-practical class: learning of theoretical content on mathematics, statistics, and causal inference. AF5 - Tutoring: the possibility of establishing weekly meetings with the professor teaching the course. AF6 - Individual student work. Teaching Methodologies: MD1 - Lectures in class by the professor with the support of computer and audiovisual media, in which the main concepts of the subject are developed. MD2 - Critical reading of texts recommended by the subject professor: press articles, reports, manuals, and/or academic articles. MD4 - Presentation and discussion in class, under the moderation of the professor, on topics related to the content of the subject, as well as practical cases. MD5 - Preparation of papers and reports individually or in groups.
Assessment System
  • % end-of-term-examination 40
  • % of continuous assessment (assigments, laboratory, practicals...) 60

Calendar of Continuous assessment


Basic Bibliography
  • Axelrod, Robert. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(2): 203-226..
  • Bicchieri, Cristina. (2017). Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 1..
  • Brown,JacobandRyanEnos.(2021). The Measurement of Partisan Sorting for 180 Million Voters. Nature Human Behaviour 5(8): 998-1008..
  • Castanho Silva, Bruno and Christopher Wratil. (2021). Do parties¿ representation failures affect populist attitudes? Evidence from a multinational survey experiment. Political Science Research and Methods, 1-16.
  • Charnysh, Volha, Lucas, Christopher, and Singh, Prerna. (2015). The Ties That Bind: National Identity Salience and Pro-Social Behavior Toward the Ethnic Other. Comparative Political Studies, 48(3): 267-300.
  • Dehdari, Sirus H., and Kai Gehring (2022). The Origins of Common Identity: Evidence from Alsace-Lorraine. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14 (1): 261-92.
  • Dinas, Elias and Ksenia Northmore-Ball. (2020). The Ideological Shadow of Authoritarianism. Comparative Political Studies 53(12): 1957¿1991.
  • Dinas, Elias, Fouka, Vasiliki, and Alain Schlapfer. (2021). Family History and Attitudes toward Out-Groups: Evidence from the European Refugee Crisis. Journal of Politics 83(2): 647-661.
  • Dinas, Elias, Martínez Soler, Sergi and Vicente Valentim (2022). Social Norm Change, Political Symbols, and Expression of Stigmatized Preferences. Journal of Politics.
  • Gingrich, Jane and Ben Ansell. (2014). Sorting for Schools: Housing, Education and Inequality. Socio-Economic Review 12(2): 329¿351.
  • Graham, Matthew and Milan Svolik (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review 114(2): 392-409.
  • Greif, Avner (2006). Family Structure, Institutions, and Growth: the Origins and Implications of Western Corporations.. American Economic Review 96(2): 308-312..
  • Grumbach, Jacob. (2022). Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding. American Political Science Review: 1-22.
  • Guiso, Luigi, Sapienza, Paolo, and Luigi Zingales. (2006). Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2): 23¿48.
  • Homola, Jonathan, Pereira, Miguel, and Margareth Tavits. (2020). Legacies of the Third Reich: ConcentrationCampsandOut-groupIntolerance. AmericanPoliticalScienceReview 114(2), 573-590.
  • Kulkarni, Parashar. (2017). The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay: Can Religious 3Norms Undermine Effective Property Rights?: Evidence from Inheritance Rights of Widows in Colonial India.. British Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 479-499.
  • Levendusky,Matthew.(2018). Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?. Journal of Politics 80(1): 59-70..
  • Maxwell, Rahsaan. (2019). Cosmopolitan Immigration Attitudes in Large European Cities: Contextual or Compositional Effects?. American Political Science Review 113(2): 456474.
  • Muller-Crepon, Carl, Schvitz, Guy and Cederman, Lars-Erik (2023). Shaping states into nations: the effects of ethnic geography on state borders. American Journal of Political Science.
  • Nemerever, Zoe and Melissa Rogers. (2021). Measuring the Rural Continuum in Political Science. Political Analysis, 29(3), 267-286.
  • Nunn, Nathan and Leonard Wantchekon (2011). The Slave Trade and the Origins of Mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review, 101(7): 3221-52..
  • Paglayan, Agustina S (2022). Education or Indoctrination? The Violent Origins of Public School Systems in an Era of State-Building. American Political Science Review 116(4): 12421257.
  • Paluck, Elizabeth and Donald P. Green. (2009). Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice. Annual Review of Psychology 60(1): 339-367.
  • Pereira, Miguel (2021). Understanding and Reducing Biases in Elite Beliefs About the Electorate. American Political Science Review 115(4): 1308-1324.
  • Posner, Daniel. (2004). The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review 98(4) 529-545.
  • Rozenas, Arturas and Yuri Zhukov. (2019). Mass Repression and Political Loyalty: Evidence from Stalin¿s¿ Terror by Hunger. American Political Science Review 113(2): 569-583.
  • Shayo,Moses.(2009). ¿A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution. American Political Science Review 103(2): 147-174..
  • Suryanarayan,Pavithra. (2019). When do the poor vote for the right wing and why: Status hierarchy and vote choice in the Indian states. Comparative Political Studies 52(2), 209-245.
  • Ziblatt, Daniel, Hilbig, Hanno, and Daniel Bischof. (2023). Wealth of Tongues: Why Peripheral Regions Vote for the Radical Right in Germany. American Political Science Review.

The course syllabus may change due academic events or other reasons.